10/31/2009

And SW Was Wrong Why?

Southwest apologizes to mom on Calif. flight
Fri Oct 30, 10:39 pm ET

SAN JOSE, Calif. – A spokesman for Southwest Airlines says the carrier has apologized to a mother who was kicked off a plane along with her unruly 2-year-old earlier this week.

Spokesman Chris Mainz said the airline called Pamela Root on Friday to apologize. He says Root also will receive a refund and a $300 travel voucher.

The crew bounced Root and her son Adam off the San Jose-bound flight because passengers could not hear preflight safety announcements.

Root says she was confident Adam's screams of "Go! Plane! Go!" and "I want Daddy!" would subside after the plane took off Monday in Amarillo, Texas.

The 38-year-old mom said she hoped to be compensated for the portable crib and diapers she had to buy for the extra night away from home.

-------------------------------------------------

Hmmm. They're in Amarillo, TX. So where'd they stay the night before they boarded? They didn't need a portable crib for that night, so why for this night? Most hotels can provide this amenity anyway. Nice excuse to get a new baby accessory for free. Reimbursed for diapers? Wouldn't she have had to spend money on diapers anyway, at some point in time? I say big KUDOS to SouthWest Airlines for having the cajones to do what most of us wish was done more often. Control your child or get off the plane, lady. Or off the bus or out of the store.

10/30/2009

Let's Do Some Math With Obama's Stimulus Plan

Oh boy. My sarcasm is on full boil right now. Just read a news article that stated Obama's stimulus plan of 787 billion dollars has "saved or created" about 650,000 jobs and is on track to meet its goal of saving or creating 3.5 million jobs by next year. OK, that's awesome that jobs are being created and/or saved. But hmmmm... who's got a calculator handy? My calculator says that it will cost $225,000 for each job that's saved or created. Forget the costs of saving all those CEOs' multi-million-dollar-a-year jobs, that's not part of the equation. So who has the demographics handy for the United States and can provide the number of people who currently have jobs, so we can do a breakdown of what it's going to cost us in taxes to pay for these new jobs?

Also I'd like to see a breakdown of whether this will ultimately cost us more to have this many people working, or if it would have been cheaper to keep them on welfare or unemployment? My initial calculations suggest that, based on a family of 4 receiving welfare and food stamps to the tune of about $1200 a month, that same family could live for 15 years for the same cost of creating one job ($225,000) that very possibly won't exist in another 15 years. Assuming the worker in the family remains gainfully employed in that job. Remember, a minimum wage job (let's assume minimum wage is $8 per hour) only pays $16,640 per year before taxes and insurance withholdings. Less take-home than the $1200 per month from welfare and food stamps. Hmmmm... what's wrong with this picture?

I'm thinking, here in my world where my house payment is 40% of my take-home income and I'm STILL getting all my bills paid, having been gainfully employed steadily for the last 12 years and being responsible... I'm thinking that this over-hyped stimulus plan is really designed to create and foster an even wider gap between the lower classes and the upper classes at the cost of those of us in the middle.

Not to mention everyone who isn't going to get a cost of living increase this next year as a result of all this so-called stimulus... Social Security recipients, VA benefits recipients, most Government workers, military, etc. Gas prices have gone up, electricity prices have gone up, food prices have gone up. So what if housing prices have gone down? How does that help people who already have mortgages or rent payments? It only helps those who already have the money to buy a house. Shrug... doesn't seem to be much of an all-inclusive stimulus plan to me, just seems like it's going to benefit the people who already are doing OK. Hmmmmmm... Thoughts, anyone?

10/25/2009

Science Meets Art

Or, Swiss Steak ala Kathy. Well. OK, yup, I'm gonna bore you with another recipe. So I like to cook :) Had a pair of huge chuck steaks I didn't know what to do with. No propane for the bbq, and while they're really, really good cooked ala restaurant-style "roasting," I also didn't feel inspired to come up with something else new to use all the leftover steak there'd be later on. So I looked around the house only to find just a few of my favorite ingredients and barely a smattering of stand-bys. Hmmmm.

So here's what you can do when you've got meat, flour, spices, an onion, a couple cans of mushrooms, a couple cans of tomato paste and a stray can of golden mushroom soup:

Thaw the meat. Lay it out on a plate and spice it up, rubbing in the spices on both sides. I used onion salt, pepper, garlic powder and just a wee bit of chili powder. Then dredge the meat in flour. Put some oil (maybe a little more than just covering the bottom) in your heavy duty frying pan (or whatever heavy kettle you have) and heat it to where it's not quite smoking. My frying pan of choice is, of course, an old cast iron workhorse. If little water drops will sprizzle and spurt when you flick 'em into the oil, it's just right. Turn on your exhaust fan ;) Put the steaks in and sear them until nicely browned on both sides. Turn down the heat to mid-way, put the steaks in your oven roaster and set aside. Turn the oven on to 350 or thereabouts. While the meat is searing, drain the mushrooms, and slice the onion. Put these prepared ingredients into the frying pan, covering with a lid. Let them saute awhile, stirring occasionally, 'til the onions are soft-ish. Then pour this mixture over the meat. If there's any oil in this mixture, drain it off first. There shouldn't be any oil, tho.

Get out a bowl and put the golden mushroom soup and a can of water in it. Then add the 2 cans of tomato paste. Mix it up then taste it. Think awhile about what flavor you're looking for. It is on the sweet side, as is. I added beef bullion powder, onion salt, garlic powder, some chives, a bit of basil, a bit of chili powder and some pepper. Since I don't measure much of anything, all I can say is "some" means a little to start, stir it up and taste it, and adjust accordingly :) Too many years of cooking to taste rather than following recipes, I guess :) I did use what looked like about maybe two tablespoons of beef bullion powder. This will be a bit thick, so add some water... maybe equivalent to half a soup can's worth. Pour this over the steaks, cover and bake for an hour. You can bake it for two hours if you want, just turn down the heat a bit and watch it for getting too thick and sticking during the second hour. Clean and foil-wrap a couple nice potatoes and throw them in the oven beside the roaster if you want. Another win with the big appetites sharing the meal :) Does this ol' gal's heart good to know I still have the touch. I'd guesstimate this could serve at least 4 really hungry people, these steaks were each about 8" x 8" and an inch thick. Chucks are fairly tender cuts anyway, so this meal melts in your mouth. People generally cook round steaks in a similar manner to this, because that tough cut will turn out tender. But I want to find something slightly different to do with the rounds I have in the freezer, so chucks it was for tonight.

Leftovers can be frozen for later :) Please pardon my vagueness regarding temperatures and times... my stove doesn't do what the knobs say it's supposed to do, so what might be "hi" for you is probably "medium" for me. I've ruined a few cakes in the process of getting to know my stove, needless to say. My recipes are the place where science meets art... one discipline can step in to balance out a deficit in the other. *grin*

Pretty Darned Good Baked BBQ Chicken

Been super busy lately, but finally did take some time to cook a meal for a change. Came out pretty good, so thought I'd share a recipe that should be a hit with those who like bbq chicken. I like making up recipes and usually they turn out palatable, but this one was a hit with everybody.

Oven-Baked BBQ Chicken Breasts

Pat dry 4 boneless/skinless chicken breasts or 6 thighs or however many of whichever you want. Rub them down all over with a light coat of mayo, then sprinkle them on both sides with the following:

A bit of salt and pepper
Some garlic powder
Some oregano, some basil and a few crushed pepper flakes.

Place them in whatever baking pan they'll fit in, and bake at 350 for about 20-25 minutes.

While they're baking, take a cup of whatever cheap boring BBQ sauce you have, Safeway store brand 2-for-a-buck works just fine, and pour into a flat container. Add a pinch of dry mustard, a few red pepper flakes, a pinch of chili powder, a bit of garlic powder and some pepper and mix up. When the chicken has cooked 20-25 minutes, remove it from the oven and coat it in the BBQ sauce. Place back in the baking pan and bake for another 20-25 minutes. The BBQ sauce will be nice and sticky and the meat will be moist and flavorful.

The application of the mayo helps make a glaze on the chicken so the moisture stays in, and it allows the spices to stick and actually flavor the meat rather than falling off and just flavoring the pan drippings. Don't be afraid of using the basil and oregano with the BBQ sauce, it really does work nicely. The layer of mayo is also a great trick for halibut steaks, stuffed sole and baked salmon - keeps the moisture in and helps make a nice glaze. Don't overdo it, just coat it lightly with your hands.

Alas, time to get ready for work. Stay tuned for my return to regular posting :) And... have a GREAT DAY!!!!

9/18/2009

The World's Most Popular Political Quiz

Here's a little something to play around with :)


The World's Most Popular Political Quiz

How the World's Smallest Political Quiz redefined politics, took over the Internet, impressed the experts, and made politics fun for more than 3 million people

After taking the World's Smallest Political Quiz, the famous online test that instantly pinpoints your political ideology, no two people have exactly the same reaction. Click on the post title to take the quiz yourself and see.

Consider Courtney, a self-described "young Republican." She took the Quiz and was surprised by the result. "I [scored] libertarian centrist," she said. "I really think I lean to the right, but apparently some aspect of my social liberalism has centered me. Interesting."

For blogger Jessy, the Quiz confirmed what she already knew. The avowed liberal landed smack-dab in the liberal quadrant and said, "I could not agree more."

Then there's Krzysztof -- nicknamed "Critto" -- from Poland. For him, the Quiz was exciting. "I am a libertarian, after taking the Quiz!" he said enthusiastically. "I love the World's Smallest Political Quiz, for it is cute, small, and very useful."

Cute? Well, OK; let's not argue with a guy named Critto. Small? You bet. It takes less than two minutes to zip through. Useful? Absolutely, if the surge of people taking the Quiz is any proof.

Every day, more than 4,000 people flock to the Web site of the Advocates for Self- Government (www.theadvocates.org/quiz.html) to take the Quiz. That's 166 people an hour, 24 hours a day. In fact, since 1996, when the Advocates started tracking results, more than 3.6 million people have clicked, moused, and surfed their way to the Quiz.

Why the enormous popularity -- especially when so many other political quizzes clutter up the Internet?

Sharon Harris, president of the Advocates, has a theory. "The Quiz offers a more diverse way of looking at politics," she said. "It gives people a fast, accurate way of determining who agrees with them most."

That "more diverse" insight is the key. Before the Quiz came along, politics was a two- way street. You were either liberal or conservative, and that was that.

Enter David Nolan, an MIT political-science graduate. In 1969, Nolan realized that traditional political definitions didn't make sense. He observed that liberals usually supported personal liberty (they defended free speech), but opposed economic liberty (they liked high taxes and strict regulation of business). Conservatives were the opposite. They supported economic liberty (low taxes and minimal regulations), but opposed personal liberty (they applauded laws against pornography).

So far, so good. But what about people who supported both personal and economic liberty? They didn't fit. Nether did people who opposed both personal and economic liberty.

Nolan finally resolved the paradox. "I began to doodle around with the idea of trying to reduce the political universe to a graphical depiction," he told The Liberator magazine in 1996. "I thought, 'Maybe we can delineate this on some kind of map, using a two-axis graph.' "

That was the breakthrough. Instead of looking at politics as a two-way line, Nolan designed a political chart that went in four directions -- high or low on economic issues, and high or low on personal issues.

Conservatives and liberals fit in this new political spectrum. So did libertarians and statists, who Nolan added to the mix. Libertarians scored high/high on liberty issues; statists scored low/low. Later, centrists were added in the middle -- and the Nolan Chart, a new way of looking at politics, was born.

In 1985, Marshall Fritz, founder of the Advocates for Self-Government, added 10 questions to the chart. He squeezed it all onto a business card-size handout, dubbed it the World's Smallest Political Quiz, and took it to a local print shop.

The rest is history. Over the years, the nonpartisan Advocates distributed 7 million printed copies of the Quiz to help spread the word about libertarianism. In 1995, the Quiz made the jump to cyberspace where it immediately became the Internet's most popular political quiz, with 13,400 Web sites linked to it today.

But is it accurate? After all, the Advocates is a libertarian organization. Did they rig the Quiz so everyone would score libertarian?

No, says an expert. Cynthia Carter, professor of History and Political Science at Florida Community College at Jacksonville, said, "Although this quiz is provided by a Libertarian organization, it does not lead you to answer in any particular way."

That may be why instructors around the USA use the Quiz in their classrooms. If you peeked into classrooms at Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government, Carnegie Mellon University, or Texas A&M University (to name just a few) over the past few years, you'd find find students answering the Quiz's questions.

Even cynical reporters -- always eager to expose a phony -- have been impressed by the Quiz's insight and honesty. For example, the Washington Post reported, "The Quiz has gained respect as a valid measure of a person's political leanings."

But don't let the scholarly recommendations fool you. The Quiz isn't a boring political science project -- it's fun. In fact, that is the one reaction that just about everybody who takes the Quiz does have in common.

Professional astrologer Adze Mixxe said it best. No matter what your political identity is, he told people, "You will get 100 percent enjoyment from the World's Smallest Political Quiz." And isn't that a political score everyone can agree on?


9/16/2009

The People Speak

Here's an interesting read :) Call it an unplanned follow-up on my earlier poll regarding the media. One of our local news stations put out the question to the public, regarding our trust of the media. Click the title of this post to read hundreds of the public's answers, or click here: http://www.kxly.com/Global/story.asp?S=11128895

Sound Off: Do you still trust news reports?

Posted: Sep 14, 2009 2:25 PM PDT Updated: Sep 15, 2009 12:10 PM PDT

The number of Americans who don't trust news reporters is at an all time high. A new Pew Research Study shows that 63% believe news stories are inaccurate. An overwhelming majority- 74%- say stories favor one side or the other. For the first time, a majority of Democrats have joined Republicans and Independents in saying news reports are biased. Study authors say the internet makes finding mistakes and biases much easier. What do you think? Do you still trust news reports? Email us: soundoff@kxly.com

9/12/2009

Too Many Zukes? Overwhelmed? Try Baked Zucchini Slices

Here's something different to do with your over-abundance of zucchini. And it's even relatively healthy! Shhhhh... don't tell anyone ;)

2 medium zucchini (or one big one) cut into 1/4" slices
1 cup plain or seasoned bread crumbs
Ground black pepper to taste
Garlic powder to taste
Italian seasoning to taste
Onion powder to taste
A dash or so of chili powder, to taste
1 tbs. beef bullion powder
1/2 cup grated Parmesan cheese (the kind in the can)
2 whole eggs (can use just the whites, or even egg beaters if desired)

Preheat oven to 475 F

In one small bowl, stir together the bread crumbs and other dry ingredients. Taste for flavor, adjust as needed.

Beat the eggs in a separate bowl. Dip zucchini slices into the egg (I like to put the beaten egg into a zip lock bag and shake all the zucchini slices in it all at once). Then dip the slices in the bread mixture, and place on a greased baking sheet.

Bake for 5 minutes in the preheated oven, then turn over and bake for another 5-10 minutes, until browned and crispy.

Serve with marinara sauce or ranch dressing. Makes a couple baking sheets full.

Actually, these baked slices can be used as a base for a nice zucchini parmigiana, as well. A bit different result than the usual parmigiana, but well worth the extra few minutes needed to follow the above recipe. Great addition to a veggie lasagna too, use as one of the layers.

You can also freeze these for later casserole-type use. After you remove them from the oven, let them cool on the baking sheets, then put the entire pan into the freezer. Once the slices are frozen, bag 'em up and return them to the freezer. Using them later, the texture won't suffer and the flavors will be great, so rest comfortable knowing they'll be a fine addition to a future recipe.

9/10/2009

Erosion of 4th Amendment Rights in Washington

From the Seattle PI today. Daily it appears our Constitutional Rights are being eroded. Here goes the 4th Amendment down the tube. Not that drunk drivers should be allowed to skate free, quite the opposite. My personal feeling is that one's driving privileges should be removed for life on the FIRST DUI accident conviction, period. I also believe that impairment, for DUI purposes, should be demonstrated by more than a mere .08 BAC. People can have .08 and have no impairment whatsoever. I do however believe that forcing a blood test (for anything) is an infringement on one's rights against unreasonable search and siezure. That's my thought for the day.

Thursday, September 10, 2009


Police can force blood tests on suspected drunken drivers, high court rules

By LEVI PULKKINEN
SEATTLEPI.COM STAFF

In a divided decision, the state Supreme Court on Thursday upheld rules allowing law officers obtain search warrants to force blood tests from suspected drunken drivers.

Following a challenge by a motorcyclist who was forced to submit to a blood after a crash in Seattle, a 7-2 majority of justices found that officers acted correctly in drawing the man's blood after securing a search warrant. A Seattle Municipal Court judge initially held that the blood evidence could not be used against motorcyclist Robert St. John; a King County Superior Court judge reversed that decision and St. John appealed.

At issue, according to the majority opinion authored by Justice Susan Owens, was a provision in the state's "implied consent" law, which generally holds that drivers agree to submit to a blood alcohol-level tests under reasonable grounds. Drivers may refuse -- and often do, primarily to deny authorities evidence against them -- but in doing so usually lose driving privileges.

The majority found that state law allowing drivers to refuse such tests does not prohibit law enforcement from conducting a blood draw pursuant to a search warrant.

"The implied consent statute explicitly allows a police officer to obtain a blood alcohol test pursuant to a warrant," Owens wrote, "even after a driver refuses a voluntary blood alcohol test."

Writing in dissent, Justice Richard Sanders argued that the majority had misinterpreted a 2004 addition to the implied consent law, which notes that the law does not preclude "a police officer from obtaining a search warrant for a person's breath or blood." The dissenting justices held that phrase was meant to apply in instances where blood had already been drawn, not to compel a test.

Sanders also lauded Seattle Municipal Court Judge Judith Hightower's original finding that the law does not "authorize additional evidence gathering" after a suspected drunken driver refuses a blood alcohol test

"Obtaining a blood sample from St. John by search warrant plainly violated the express prohibition of (statute) since St. John withdrew his consent and no exception under the statute applied," Sanders wrote in the dissent. "If we accept the majority's reasoning, a driver's refusal to consent … would be meaningless."

Owens was joined in the majority by Chief Justice Gerry Alexander, as well as justices Charles Johnson, Barbara Madsen, Tom Chambers, Mary Fairhurst and Debra Stephens. Justice James Johnson joined Sanders in the dissent.

Levi Pulkkinen can be reached at 206-448-8348 or levipulkkinen@seattlepi.com.

9/09/2009

You Have a Voice! Use It!!

TODAY: Call your Representative that sits on the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform and ask that they vote in favor of H.R. 1881, for TSA Collective Bargaining Rights! You can find your representatives by entering your zip code in the section to the right of this text.

A list is also available at this location: Click Here.


* Ask your members of congress to support the House-passed unused FERS sick leave package of provisions in the House-Senate DOD Authorization Conference! Click Here.

* Ask your Representatives to support HR 1507, the Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2009! Click Here.

* Support for Pay Parity! Click Here.

* Oppose the Boehner/Cantor proposals to change retirement rules for federal employees! Click Here.

* Ask your representative to cosponsor H.R. 2978! H.R.2978 can lift the cap of age 22 for eligibility for coverage as a dependent under FEHBP! Click Here.

* Support Equal Treatment in Benefits for Federal Employees! Ask your Senators and Representatives to support S. 1102 in the Senate and H.R. 2517 in the House, for the Domestic Partnership Benefits and Obligation Act! Click Here.

* Ask your Representative to co-sponsor H.R. 2736 to make the federal contracting process fairer to federal employees and more accountable to taxpayers! Click Here.

* Ask your Senator to co-sponsor S.924, to make the federal contracting process fairer to federal employees and more accountable to taxpayers! Click Here.

* Ask your Senators and Representatives to co-sponsor S.707 and H.R. 1722 for Telework! Click Here.

* Ask your Senator to co-sponsor S.354 for Paid Parental Leave today! Click Here.

* Ask your Representative to co-sponsor HR235, The Windfall Elimination Provision! Click Here.

* Ask your Senator to cosponsor S. 469, to support retirement annuities for future CSRS retirees! Click Here.

* Ask your Representative to cosponsor H.R. 1203, the Premium Conversion Bill! Click Here.

* Ask your Senator to cosponsor S.491, the Premium Conversion Bill! Click Here.

9/05/2009

Oven Roasted Tomatoes

Are you overwhelmed with excess tomatoes from your garden this fall? Here's the answer! Much easier than making and canning salsa, tomato juice or sauce or paste, and much more versatile! There is absolutely nothing like roasting tomatoes to bring out the best tomato flavor and in my book, there is virtually no other way to freeze tomatoes that will result in as fine a product as this.

While Roma tomatoes are the best for this recipe, as they're drier, any tomato will do nicely. I used Romas this year, and made salsa from the Ruetger's and the Early Girls - those that didn't get eaten as BLTs or tomato sandwiches, that is!

Slice your Romas in half, and remove the seeds and juice. Lay them out on however many cookie sheets you think you might need. The bottom of a broiler pan works great too. I can only do two pans at a time, due to oven size. You can crowd them together on the pan, because they shrink quite a bit while roasting.

Get out a big mixing bowl, and put about 1/2 to 3/4 of a cup of olive oil in it. Add some sea salt, some pepper, some celery flakes, some parsley flakes, some rosemary and some basil. Measurements? Well, I used probably half a teaspoon of celery flakes, salt and pepper, and maybe a teaspoon and a half or so of the others. Add about a tablespoon of minced garlic and some of the oil from the jar too. When I use fresh garlic, I use probably 4 cloves, pressed. Mix it all up, then dump all the tomatoes in. Mix them up real good with your hands, then lay them back out onto the pans. Any leftover oil mixture, just put over the top of the tomatoes.

Put them in the oven at about 250, and let 'em roast. I like them a bit more done than not, so I figure about 5 hours, or when they're dried and starting to carmelize but still somewhat soft. In about an hour's time, your house will smell fabulous!

These can be frozen, or stored in the refrigerator. To freeze, let them cool then place the pans in the freezer so the tomatoes will freeze individually. Then put them into zip lock bags or plastic containers and return them to the freezer. To store them in the refrigerator, I prefer to put them into pint jars then fill the jars with olive oil. Figure about 2-3 weeks this way... only 4-5 days without the olive oil. Use the excess oil when the tomatoes are gone for sauteeing or as dip for bread. I don't recommend canning these because the oil will cause the lids to not seal properly.

You can remove the skins after they're roasted, if you prefer.

These are fantastic on toasted breads as an appetizer, or to add to your Italian red sauces, or cut up in pasta salads. They go nicely in soups and stews, too. Quite a few of these get eaten plain here, by themselves, before they ever even get to the freezer!

If you're using tomatoes other than Romas, cut them into wedges and be sure to remove the seeds and juices. They may take a bit longer to roast, because the flesh is juicier, but they'll taste just as good.

Feel free to experiment with any herbs that you might prefer, toward recipes you might like to use them in.

Enjoy!